Sunday, September 16, 2007

"Maybe It Should Be Called Douchestock ... "

Salty Talk Erupts,
And Tyrants Rush In



Colin McEnroe

To Wit


Hartford Courant
Page A2


It seems almost inevitable that Lewis Mills High School in Burlington will someday do for "douche bag" what Juneau-Douglas High School in Alaska did for "Bong hits for Jesus," which is take an intemperate outburst by a spirited and peevish teenager and put it on the lips of the justices of our nation's highest court.

I am referring to the case of Avery Doninger, who was kicked out of the LMHS student government for saying - on her essentially private page of the LiveJournal social networking site - "Jamfest is canceled due to the douchbags [sic] in central office."

I won't even delve into what this sentence means or into the other facts of the case, some of which have been reported in this newspaper and all of which have been reported pretty exhaustively on the Internet, where it might be fair to say that Avery Doninger has attained the status of Sacco and Vanzetti, were it not also true that the reference would be lost on about 80 percent of the people participating in the Doninger brouhaha.

In fact, even though my sympathies are utterly with the Doninger side of the case, I've become just a teeny bit uncomfortable with all the energy marshaled on her behalf. Righting the wrong that caused Avery Doninger to lose her office as class secretary is, from the looks of things, a more pressing matter than righting the wrong that caused two young men, roughly her age, to get shot in the face in Hartford's Parkville section earlier this summer, apparently by Martians who vanished into another dimension immediately thereafter.

That, of course, is an unfair comparison, but I can't get over my lingering sense that if you want anyone in Connecticut to care about anything bad that happened to you, you're a lot better off not being black or poor or ugly. But that's a different column.

Meanwhile, some of the brightest lights in Connecticut writing, including Wally Lamb, will assemble Oct. 14 to read and speak and help raise money for Doninger's legal fees, as her case moves through the federal courts. (Philip Roth, don't you dare sit this out!) Even dim bulbs like me have been invited, as well as five local bands, so maybe it should be called Douchestock or something.

I'm actually not going to participate, again not because I don't sympathize, but because I'd like to maintain some illusion of journalistic distance.

I actually think the case is vitally important, because almost any case involving speech and government is vitally important, particularly as long as the Bush administration remains in power.

The Bushies themselves are, it should never be forgotten, a foul-mouthed and vulgar clan. In (fittingly) 1984, George H.W. Bush emerged from his vice-presidential debate with Geraldine Ferraro, the first woman ever to compete at that level in American politics. The kindly, patrician Bush told a group of longshoremen the next day that he "tried to kick a little ass" the previous night. It was telling that, even in his pathetic ersatz Stanley Kowalski moment, he was only confident that he had tried. His much more ass-kicking gorgon of a wife called Ferraro an "I can't say it but it rhymes with `rich.'"

The current President Bush called New York Times reporter Adam Clymer a "major league ass---e" during the 2000 campaign. His creep of a veep, Dick Cheney, visited the august floor of the U.S. Senate and told Sen. Pat Leahy to "go f--k yourself." Bush, talking to the prime minister of England at a G8 meeting, said "s--t" into a live mike. (Here, I'm doing what sportswriter Steve Rushin calls "obscene Hangman.")

While this was going on, the same group of people installed a tough new FCC and pushed through a bill that added a zero to the top indecency fines, from $32,500 to $325,000 per station per incident.

This was ostensibly to protect us from Janet Jackson's nipple, but it was more truly a way of controlling speech. Bush and Cheney are at heart - and I do not say this lightly - tyrants, and it is a rare tyrant who will pass up a chance to limit what is said by the people of his land.

You don't have to exercise that power all the time. But having the hook means you can jerk just about any fish out of the water when you need to.

After Sept. 11, 2001, Bush spokesman Ari Fleischer said, apropos of comedian Bill Maher, that all Americans "need to watch what they say." Good idea. If you keep us cowed, if you secure for the government the right to decide what can be said, you're well on your way to owning the language, so you can, just for example, rewrite the definition of "torture" that it does not include many things that are, well, torture.

And once you get rolling, you can redefine other words, like "success," and you can claim you are reducing troops when, in fact, you've actually just run out of them. You can claim there are 36 nations helping us in Iraq, even if nobody knows what they are.

If you want a glimpse of government's true attitude toward speech, check out a few prisons, which are one of the few places where government is really allowed to control just about everything.

Wally Lamb was helping to run a writing program at a woman's prison. When it got too famous, the prison suspended the program, confiscated all the computer disks from the program and erased all the program information from the hard drives. When "60 Minutes" wanted to interview one of the affected prisoners, that turned out not to be allowed.

School, as any teenager will tell you, is one rung up from prison. You get more freedom than you do at York Correctional, but no more than they really have to give you.

That's why a lot people are fighting hard for one young woman's right to type the word "douche bag." Maybe she shouldn't have used that word, but then she was sitting at home when she wrote it. I mean, it's not like she said the f-word on the floor of the Senate.



You can hear Colin McEnroe's talk show weekdays from 3 to 6 p.m. on WTIC-AM 1080.


  • Sacco And Vanzetti


  • Illustration


  • Palm Joins Poets & Writers For Avery


  • Waterbury Paper Notes Lineup


  • Food For Poets & Writers & Friends


  • Original Announcement


  • Lamb Interview


  • Orwellian Escalation


  • Pitchforks & Burning Torches


  • Big Chill


  • Beyond The Headlines


  • Thought For The Day


  • TRAVESTY


  • Retro Douche Bag
  • 2 comments:

    a rose is a rose said...

    i don't disagree with colin on the two young men, found in hartford, being shot in the face. i don't think justice was done (or will be done) and the main reason was/is the color of their skin.

    i DO disagree about the importance of the avery doninger case though. it IS important for ALL of us and OUR CHILDREN. first they'll erode their rights, THEN OURS.

    Lauren Doninger said...

    During a break on the fourth day of the preliminary hearing for injunctive relief in federal court, New Haven, the ACLU attorney, Professor Martin Margulies, asked if this process had piqued Avery’s interest in law. The answer to that question was and is a declarative, NO! The process has been grueling in every conceivable way. It is not a system that Avery (or I) would like to participate in regularly – preferably, never again!

    I went on to describe to Professor Margulies how disappointing and humbling it was to realize the difficulty involved with seeking redress through the courts. Had we possessed one less resource in any area – and financial was just the beginning; less information technology; literacy; work flexibility (could a 7-3 laborer take 4 days off to go to court? Doubtful); reliable transportation; wardrobe; etc., we could not have brought this action. When Colin writes about the Parkville shootings, the disparity resonates with me.

    Communities can’t afford to fight only one battle for justice at a time – it’s too much a game of whack a weasel. It is exactly because of the abuses of power, such as Colin cites; that Avery’s speech needs to be protected.

    I hope that Avery and the cohorts at Lewis S. Mills High School who have been actively involved in this process will take the experience and develop a broader sense of responsibility for ensuring social justice, as well as an example of how it is done (e.g., poets and writers give of their time and take a position!). This group of incredibly entitled kids who are part of what I’ll call generation inertia (with helicopter parents, present company included, hovering) is witnessing and participating in social action – we need another Woodstock generation.

    I hope that some of these teens will take this experience and grow to become public school educators who do NOT fall prey to the sense of tyrannical power that led the LSM administrators down this path. I hope that some become civil rights lawyers like Jon L. Schoenhorn, who take on a case like this for a tiny, symbolic retainer – because it’s the only way people will defend their civil liberties. I hope that some will become writers and commentators who think globally and push readers to consider a larger context. I hope that some will become politicians who work toward real solutions to what is happening in Parkville and Darfur. I hope that these kids will be part of a generation that stops the erosion of civil liberties.

    October 14th 1 to 6 – Litchfield Inn – come hear some of CT’s best and brightest writers and poets, hear some of the LSM bands that Avery so passionately wanted to play in the new taxpayer funded auditorium that she lost her 16 year old temper, come buy a banned t-shirt that an LSM student designed because he understood fundamental principles of democracy. Come because it’s Douchestock and too many of the Woodstock generation have become THE MAN!